<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HDD fail :/</title>
	<atom:link href="http://estan.dose.se/2009/08/hdd-fail/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://estan.dose.se/2009/08/hdd-fail</link>
	<description>Random stuff on my mind, or reports from my trips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 21:26:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Steigerwald</title>
		<link>http://estan.dose.se/2009/08/hdd-fail#comment-1889</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Steigerwald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://estan.dose.se/?p=160#comment-1889</guid>
		<description>I have been lucky. From the Hitachi drives I bought not one have ever failed me. The one in my ThinkPad T23 is over 5 years. Hmmm, the Seagates in my good, old rusty Amiga 4000 are also still working ;). I had problems with a Samsung drive tough - I heard mixed stuff about them, from &quot;never had a problem with them&quot; to &quot;does not work reliably&quot;.

I think I will keep with Hitachi as long as these drives just work for me. And no, I think I wouldn&#039;t buy the same drive again if it failed me before. Unless the manufacturer could convince me that it was just one from a defective batch of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been lucky. From the Hitachi drives I bought not one have ever failed me. The one in my ThinkPad T23 is over 5 years. Hmmm, the Seagates in my good, old rusty Amiga 4000 are also still working ;). I had problems with a Samsung drive tough &#8211; I heard mixed stuff about them, from &#8220;never had a problem with them&#8221; to &#8220;does not work reliably&#8221;.</p>
<p>I think I will keep with Hitachi as long as these drives just work for me. And no, I think I wouldn&#8217;t buy the same drive again if it failed me before. Unless the manufacturer could convince me that it was just one from a defective batch of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: estan</title>
		<link>http://estan.dose.se/2009/08/hdd-fail#comment-1882</link>
		<dc:creator>estan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://estan.dose.se/?p=160#comment-1882</guid>
		<description>Yea, thanks for your tips. But this time I just simply didn&#039;t have time to go do the whole dd dance and try to rescue stuff, and I really didn&#039;t lose any important data. And I did consider SSD, but decided to go with yet another cheap HDD instead. SSD will have to wait for next time ;)

And yea, I like think WD is good too, that&#039;s why I went with it in the first place ;) Guess I was just unlucky this time. I used to have one of their raptor disks in my desktop when I still had it, and that was really nice and fast.

But yes, SSD is the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, thanks for your tips. But this time I just simply didn&#8217;t have time to go do the whole dd dance and try to rescue stuff, and I really didn&#8217;t lose any important data. And I did consider SSD, but decided to go with yet another cheap HDD instead. SSD will have to wait for next time ;)</p>
<p>And yea, I like think WD is good too, that&#8217;s why I went with it in the first place ;) Guess I was just unlucky this time. I used to have one of their raptor disks in my desktop when I still had it, and that was really nice and fast.</p>
<p>But yes, SSD is the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maniacmusician</title>
		<link>http://estan.dose.se/2009/08/hdd-fail#comment-1881</link>
		<dc:creator>maniacmusician</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://estan.dose.se/?p=160#comment-1881</guid>
		<description>definitely agree with the above poster about dd_rescue. it&#039;s safer, with a higher rate of success.

I think Western Digital is actually a relatively good manufacturer compared to some others, and I&#039;ve had good luck with their products. Laptop hard drives in general just suck. For my last laptop purchase, I went with a smaller hard drive in the laptop and just used a portable external drive with it, and I&#039;ve had far fewer problems. 

I&#039;ll again agree with the above poster in the recommendation of SSDs. I&#039;ll probably need a new machine next year, and am REALLY looking forward to getting rid of moving hard drive parts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>definitely agree with the above poster about dd_rescue. it&#8217;s safer, with a higher rate of success.</p>
<p>I think Western Digital is actually a relatively good manufacturer compared to some others, and I&#8217;ve had good luck with their products. Laptop hard drives in general just suck. For my last laptop purchase, I went with a smaller hard drive in the laptop and just used a portable external drive with it, and I&#8217;ve had far fewer problems. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll again agree with the above poster in the recommendation of SSDs. I&#8217;ll probably need a new machine next year, and am REALLY looking forward to getting rid of moving hard drive parts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon and run</title>
		<link>http://estan.dose.se/2009/08/hdd-fail#comment-1877</link>
		<dc:creator>anon and run</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://estan.dose.se/?p=160#comment-1877</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s why portable computers that are regularly carried around should have no moving parts, i.e. use SSD instead HDD in this case.

Also if you get I/O error it&#039;s a very bad idea to keep it running repeatedly, trying to boot a system on it an rescue data that way. Instead get a new disc with at least the same size, connect it to the system, boot the computer from a Live CD/USB stick (I always use Knoppix for that purpose even if it&#039;s usually outdated) and run dd_rescue /dev/baddrive /dev/newdrive, this will try to make a perfect image while not stopping the progress during bad I/Os and corrupted entries. Completely recovered the data of several HDDs this way already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s why portable computers that are regularly carried around should have no moving parts, i.e. use SSD instead HDD in this case.</p>
<p>Also if you get I/O error it&#8217;s a very bad idea to keep it running repeatedly, trying to boot a system on it an rescue data that way. Instead get a new disc with at least the same size, connect it to the system, boot the computer from a Live CD/USB stick (I always use Knoppix for that purpose even if it&#8217;s usually outdated) and run dd_rescue /dev/baddrive /dev/newdrive, this will try to make a perfect image while not stopping the progress during bad I/Os and corrupted entries. Completely recovered the data of several HDDs this way already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

